A new study of the sense of smell lends support to a controversial theory of olfaction: Our noses can distinguish both the shape and the vibrational characteristics of odorant molecules.
“The theory goes that when the right odorant binds to its receptor, the odorant’s molecular vibration allows electrons to transfer from one part of the receptor to another,” said University of Illinois physics andBeckman Institute professor Klaus Schulten, who conducted the analysis with postdoctoral researcher Ilia Solov’yov and graduate student Po-Yao Chang. “This electron transfer appears to fine-tune the signal the receptor receives.”
Many who study olfaction maintain that odorant receptors recognize only an odorant’s shape and surface characteristics. They dismiss the idea that molecular vibration has anything to do with it, Schulten said. Likewise, some proponents of the vibrational theory think that molecular vibration only, and not shape, guides the sense of smell. Schulten and his colleagues belong to a “third camp” that sees evidence for both, he said.
The vibrational theory of olfaction is supported by studies showing that insects, humans and other animals can tell the difference between two versions of the same odorant molecule – a normal one and an identical one with deuterium atoms substituted for each of the hydrogens. The deuterated and normal versions of the odorant have the same shape and surface characteristics, and yet humans and other animals can smell the difference, Schulten said.
“The question then is of course, for scientists, how does this happen?” he said.
To answer this question, Schulten turned to the work of a former colleague at Illinois, Rudolph Marcus, a chemist (now at the California Institute of Technology) who received the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1992 for his insights into electron transfer, one of the most basic forms of a chemical reaction.
“Marcus realized that when electrons are being exchanged between molecules the process is coupled to the vibrations of the molecules involved,” Schulten said. Marcus focused primarily on the low-frequency “rumblings” that occur as a result of molecular vibration in large molecules, Schulten said.
Odorant molecules are generally quite small, however, with a lot of high-frequency, high-energy vibrations, Schulten said. Some scientists have theorized that these high-frequency vibrations can, when an odorant binds to the right receptor, enhance the likelihood that an electron will transfer from one part of the receptor to another, sending an electrical signal that contributes to the detection of that odor.
Prior to the new study, no one had analyzed the energetics of the system to see if the vibrations of the odorant molecules – in the context of all the background vibrations that are part of the system – could actually promote electron transfer within the receptor. Schulten and his colleagues are the first to conduct such an analysis, he said.
“You can actually carry out quantum chemical calculations that determine very precisely the vibration of the molecule as well as the ability to couple it to electron transfer,” Schulten said. The calculations indicate that such an interaction is energetically feasible, he said.
Odorant receptors are embedded in membranes and so are more difficult to study than other proteins. But previous research indicates that some receptors are metalloproteins, and “the metals in the proteins are predesigned to transfer electrons,” Schulten said. “We also see that there are other amino acid side groups that can accept an electron, so the electron can be transferred through the protein.”
Like others before them, Schulten and his colleagues suggest that the odorant receptor contains both an electron donor and an electron acceptor, but that electron transfer occurs only when a specific odorant is bound to the receptor. The new calculations offer the first quantitative evidence that the odorant can in fact promote electron transfer.
Source: University of Illinois